Alderaan

SME

Alderaan

Description

The entity profile has not yet been completed.

This entity is yours?
Sign in to update information and position your organization seamlessly within the European bioproduction Value Chain. Benefit from the geolocated map to showcase your expertise, projects, and initiatives. Boost your visibility and make meaningful connections within the ecosystem. Sign in

Alderaan

Address

Paris, Ile de France, France

Contact

contact@alderaan.fr

Description

The entity profile has not yet been completed.

This entity is yours?
Sign in to update information and position your organization seamlessly within the European bioproduction Value Chain. Benefit from the geolocated map to showcase your expertise, projects, and initiatives. Boost your visibility and make meaningful connections within the ecosystem.

Matchmaking

Connect with Alderaan

Position on the value chain

With the ultimate aim to create a European alliance for bioproduction in Europe, organisations have joined forces with COBIOE. Discover who are our associates.

Bio-resources and biobanking
  • Cells, tissues and humanized xeno-organs
  • Biosamples
  • Viral, phage or bacterial specimen
Identification of biotherapies
  • Target identification
  • Target validation
  • Screening
Drug design
  • Drug assessment
  • Drug engineering
  • In vitro preclinical studies
Clinical validation
  • Clinical trials
  • In vivo preclinical validation
  • Pre-industrial scale production
Production
  • Upstream processes
  • Downstream processes
  • Quality control
Market access
  • CE mark / market authorisation
  • Payment / Reimbursement
  • Care pathways

Alderaan last news

31/01/2023

Better than RECIST and Faster than iRECIST: Defining the Immunotherapy Progression Decision Score to Better Manage Progressive Tumors on Immunotherapy | Clinical Cancer Research | American Association for Cancer Research

AbstractPurpose:. The objective of the study is to propose the immunotherapy progression decision (iPD) score, a practical tool based on patient features that are available at the first evaluation of immunotherapy treatment, to help oncologists decide whether to continue the treatment or switch rapidly to another therapeutic line when facing a progressive disease patient at the first evaluation.Experimental Design:. This retrospective study included 107 patients with progressive disease at first evaluation according to RECIST 1.1. Clinical, radiological, and biological data at baseline and first evaluation were analyzed. An external validation set consisting of 31 patients with similar baseline characteristics was used for the validation of the score.Results:. Variables were analyzed in a univariate study. The iPD score was constructed using only independent variables, each considered as a worsening factor for the survival of patients. The patients were stratified in three groups: good prognosis (GP), poor prognosis (PP), and critical prognosis (CP). Each group showed significantly different survivals (GP: 11.4, PP: 4.4, CP: 2.3 months median overall survival, P < 0.001, log-rank test). Moreover, the iPD score was able to detect the pseudoprogressors better than other scores. On the validation set, CP patients had significantly worse survival than PP and GP patients (P < 0.05, log-rank test).Conclusions:. The iPD score provides oncologists with a new evaluation, computable at first progression, to decide whether treatment should be continued (for the GP group), or immediately changed for the PP and CP groups. Further validation on larger cohorts is needed to prove its efficacy in clinical practice.